LA Board Decision-Making Elements

  • Strategic Fit.

    • Is the proposal part of the existing strategy?

    • Is the strategy still applicable?

    • If it is not part of the existing strategy, why are management submitting this proposal?

    • If reasons are substantive, then should we review the existing strategy?

  • Financial considerations.

    • Are the financial requirements of the proposal clearly articulated?

    • What effect will this project, if approved, have on our cashflow?

    • Are there robust financials giving various scenarios supporting the proposal?

    • Where necessary, has an independent financial due diligence been completed?

  • Strategic and operational risks.

    • Have the significant strategic risks been identified?

    • Are there alternative proposals that may achieve a better result?

    • Have all significant operational risks been identified?

    • Have appropriate risk management decisions been made in relation to these risks?

  • Due diligence.

    • Have the benefits and disadvantages of the proposal been clearly identified?

    • Have all appropriate areas of due diligence been completed using external resources where necessary?

    • Have all regulatory (including ACCC) issues been considered?

    • Has third party information been used to test market key assumptions?

  • Member, stakeholder and market perception.

    • How will members receive the decision?

    • If there are concerns, how are they to be managed?

    • Are there any other stakeholder issues that need to be managed (e.g. participants, customers, staff and suppliers, communities, funders)?

    • Are there other ways of constructing the proposal to enhance market perceptions?

  • Ethical fit.

    • Will LA’s values be compromised?

    • If the decision became front-page news, would it embarrass the LA or Directors personally?

    • If the decision involves other regions or communities are there any ethical or social responsibility questions?

    • Will the environment be compromised?

  • Availability of resources.

    • What effect will the transaction have on the asset base?

    • Does our current management have the competencies and resources to successfully implement the decision?

    • If alternate resources are required are they easily obtainable?

    • What effect will the decision have on other resources, including technology, premises etc?

  • Synergy.

    • Does the proposal provide potential synergies with the existing business?

    • Have the benefits derived from this synergy effect been clearly articulated?

    • Are there any other future developments that may enhance the synergy effect further?

  • Value creation.

    • Does the proposal clearly highlight the financial and non-financial outcomes?

    • How does the proposal create value for members?

    • Is there a clear mechanism to monitor/measure the value created through implementation of the proposal?

  • Contingency plans.

    • Does the proposal consider a “worst case scenario” in the event of failure?

    • Are contingency plans detailed?

  • Monitoring mechanisms.

    • Does the proposal outline Board monitoring mechanisms?

    • Do the monitoring mechanisms include

    o Regular reporting timelines

    o Progress reports covering:

    ▪ Achievement of benefits

    ▪ Risk profile and management

    ▪ Expenditure variations

    ▪ Timeline variations

    ▪ Any other concern