LA Board Decision-Making Elements
-
Strategic Fit.
• Is the proposal part of the existing strategy?
• Is the strategy still applicable?
• If it is not part of the existing strategy, why are management submitting this proposal?
• If reasons are substantive, then should we review the existing strategy?
-
Financial considerations.
• Are the financial requirements of the proposal clearly articulated?
• What effect will this project, if approved, have on our cashflow?
• Are there robust financials giving various scenarios supporting the proposal?
• Where necessary, has an independent financial due diligence been completed?
-
Strategic and operational risks.
• Have the significant strategic risks been identified?
• Are there alternative proposals that may achieve a better result?
• Have all significant operational risks been identified?
• Have appropriate risk management decisions been made in relation to these risks?
-
Due diligence.
• Have the benefits and disadvantages of the proposal been clearly identified?
• Have all appropriate areas of due diligence been completed using external resources where necessary?
• Have all regulatory (including ACCC) issues been considered?
• Has third party information been used to test market key assumptions?
-
Member, stakeholder and market perception.
• How will members receive the decision?
• If there are concerns, how are they to be managed?
• Are there any other stakeholder issues that need to be managed (e.g. participants, customers, staff and suppliers, communities, funders)?
• Are there other ways of constructing the proposal to enhance market perceptions?
-
Ethical fit.
• Will LA’s values be compromised?
• If the decision became front-page news, would it embarrass the LA or Directors personally?
• If the decision involves other regions or communities are there any ethical or social responsibility questions?
• Will the environment be compromised?
-
Availability of resources.
• What effect will the transaction have on the asset base?
• Does our current management have the competencies and resources to successfully implement the decision?
• If alternate resources are required are they easily obtainable?
• What effect will the decision have on other resources, including technology, premises etc?
-
Synergy.
• Does the proposal provide potential synergies with the existing business?
• Have the benefits derived from this synergy effect been clearly articulated?
• Are there any other future developments that may enhance the synergy effect further?
-
Value creation.
• Does the proposal clearly highlight the financial and non-financial outcomes?
• How does the proposal create value for members?
• Is there a clear mechanism to monitor/measure the value created through implementation of the proposal?
-
Contingency plans.
• Does the proposal consider a “worst case scenario” in the event of failure?
• Are contingency plans detailed?
-
Monitoring mechanisms.
• Does the proposal outline Board monitoring mechanisms?
• Do the monitoring mechanisms include
o Regular reporting timelines
o Progress reports covering:
▪ Achievement of benefits
▪ Risk profile and management
▪ Expenditure variations
▪ Timeline variations
▪ Any other concern